Home > Providers>
CONCERNEAP Affiliates>
Explanation of PR/FFD Process |
EAP Admission Criteria
Performance and Fitness for Duty Referrals
CONCERN Services contracts with employers calls for a clinical service regarding performance
and fitness for duty referrals. These cases are considered high priority and require timeliness and clinical
efficiency in providing services. As a CONCERN affiliate or provider, you may be asked to provide clinical
evaluation or treatment for such cases. In case you are contacted, the following information will assist you in
providing either evaluative or treatment services in a performance or fitness for duty case.
Definitions
Performance Referral
This level of referral may be either mandatory (a condition of employment) or
non-mandatory. The employee remains on the job while engaging in treatment which focuses on changes in behavior,
quality and quantity of work. The goal is to improve the employee's performance until it meets company
standards.
Fitness for Duty Referral
This level of referral is directly related to an employee's ability to perform his/her
work in a competent and safe manner. The employee is usually removed from the workplace and will require a thorough
psychological and/or psychiatric examination before being returned to work. This type of referral is usually
mandatory and compliance may be positioned as a condition of employment.
A. Recommended Performance Referral Guidelines
Providers asked to deliver services to clients designated as performance referrals will be
contacted by a CONCERN representative, usually a clinician or team supervisor. Information regarding the desired
areas of improvement will be provided per the employee's company. Using the performance and/or behavioral issues
as a treatment plan and guideline, the provider will be asked to engage the client in treatment and see the client
on a regular basis until treatment goals have been reached. The provider would report clinical progress,
attendance, cooperation and the specific addressing of performance/behavior issues to the CONCERN representative.
The provider would also immediately report treatment disconnect or any other issues of non-compliance to the
CONCERN representative. Under no circumstance would the provider have contact with the referring company. The
provider should expect regular contact with the CONCERN representative and can indicate when all treatment goals
have been reached, or the CONCERN representative may report such to the provider via feedback from the company.
Ultimately, decision to terminate the process rests with the employee's company.
B. Fitness For Duty Referral Guidelines:
Providers may be asked to evaluate or treat employees designated by their company as a fitness
for duty referral. This means that there are concerns regarding the employee's ability to function on the job and
perform job related responsibilities, or that the employee's behaviors indicate the possibility of a threat to
co-workers and the safety of the workplace. The employee is usually removed form the workplace until a thorough
evaluation has been performed and clearance to return to work issued by the evaluation professional. Often, the
evaluator may recommend a respite period in which the employee remains off work while engaging in recommended
treatment. Return to work in those cases usually means clearance given by the treating professional or a
re-evaluation by the original evaluate or or collaboration by the evaluating and treating professional regarding
return to work.
- Fitness for Duty Evaluations: Fitness for Duty evaluations usually consist of psychological
testing and clinical interviews performed by a licensed Clinical Psychologist or Psychiatrist. Testing
instruments should include the MMPI-2 and the current version of the MCMI Million Multi axial Inventory, as well
as other instruments designed to assist in determining ability to function and risk to commit violent acts. In
cases where there is clearly stated threat to be violent or harm others, the services of a psychologist or
psychiatrist certified in forensic evaluations would be preferred. CONCERN recommends that the referring company
be responsible for the cost of the evaluation and that the evaluating provider indicate total cost for his/her
services prior to the evaluation. The evaluating provider should have contact only with CONCERN, and the provider
will not provide treatment to the evaluated employee. The evaluation will result in 2 separate written reports,
both submitted to CONCERN within 2 weeks of the interviews and testing. One written report gives DSM-IV-TR 5 Axis
diagnostic impressions, addresses treatment, legal and other histories and provides a clear summary and
conclusion including treatment and return to work recommendations. The second report is an executive summary,
which indicates the course of testing and interview process. The second report does not include diagnosis, but
does give a summary, conclusions and recommendations regarding conditions for return to work.
- Fitness for Duty Treatment: Providers asked to treat fitness for duty clients should expect to
receive from CONCERN a complete description of the problems in the workplace, any documentation provided by the
referring company and any written reports generated as the result of a fitness for duty evaluation. Providers are
asked to provide timely and regular clinical sessions to the referred employee. Providers are also asked to provide
regular clinical updates to CONCERN including immediate notification in the event of treatment disconnect or any
other act of non-compliance. Providers should expect to treat until there is no longer clinical indication of need
for treatment or until the referring company discontinues the process. Providers are expected to address the
primary issues related to the fitness for duty referral and to collaborate with the evaluating clinician regarding
the client's ability and readiness to return to work. Providers do not have any direct contact with the referring
company.
|